Analyst Ratings for Macrogenics - Macrogenics (NASDAQ:MGNX)

[ad_1]

Over the past 3 months, 5 analysts have published their opinion on Macrogenics MGNX stock. These analysts are typically employed by large Wall Street banks and tasked with understanding a company’s business to predict how a stock will trade over the upcoming year.









Bullish Somewhat Bullish Indifferent Somewhat Bearish Bearish
Total Ratings 3 2 0 0 0
Last 30D 1 0 0 0 0
1M Ago 0 0 0 0 0
2M Ago 2 0 0 0 0
3M Ago 0 2 0 0 0

These 5 analysts have an average price target of $11.4 versus the current price of Macrogenics at $3.88, implying upside.

Below is a summary of how these 5 analysts rated Macrogenics over the past 3 months. The greater the number of bullish ratings, the more positive analysts are on the stock and the greater the number of bearish ratings, the more negative analysts are on the stock

This current average has decreased by 37.36% from the previous average price target of $18.20.

Stay up to date on Macrogenics analyst ratings.

If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance you can start by tracking it here.

Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company’s revenue streams are.

Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.

Some analysts will also offer forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide further guidance on stocks. Investors who use analyst ratings should note that this specialized advice comes from humans and may be subject to error.

This article was generated by Benzinga’s automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

[ad_2]

Image and article originally from www.benzinga.com. Read the original article here.